sâmbătă, 19 ianuarie 2013
Four Elements
vineri, 21 decembrie 2012
I AM
vineri, 2 noiembrie 2012
JADE
marți, 2 octombrie 2012
The bull, the man, the eagle and the lion
duminică, 8 aprilie 2012
The value of time (a lucid dream)
vineri, 20 ianuarie 2012
CINE SUNTEM?
duminică, 17 octombrie 2010
The unhappy westerners –a society of spectators
So why are people unhappy and stressed in the western world? I'm not saying that people in the third world or the middle east aren't unhappy,….just that usually, people in those places are unhappy because they struggle with hunger, disease and the elements. Their suffering is a simpler one. I'm not saying that it doesn't hurt as bad. The problems poor people have can be solved with physical means. They are simple problems with an uncomplicated solution. I think people living in societies with low economic mean suffer more physically and people in the western world suffer spiritually. Some of the greatest philosophers, poets, writers and artists of European origin have struggled their whole life to give meaning to life, and in the end….came up short of a real answer. Some even concluded that life has no real meaning, and that it is all in vain. They even believed that human beings are meant to suffer, bound by their condition. The people that come up with this answer are usually those of greater intelligence and education. Intelligence and education put together….this is important. So why is that? Why is the suicide rate in the occident astronomically high in comparison with that in the orient or Africa? Why do more rich and educated people come to believe that life is pointless?? Why do more people living in complex societies find no reason to live? Is it because they've seen it all and done it all and ran out of any real challenges? Is it because they ran out of things to do and to experience? Is it because they live a superficial life based on activities rather than actions and are mindlessly driven by material fulfillment? I think all of these can be true. It is the loss of meaning rather than purpose that drives people insane. This is a very important affirmation. It is in this matter that western and eastern thinking become fundamentally different. Western society needs to always give life purpose , and to continuously drive the individual towards achieving new goals and to fulfill new desires. This hides the fact that this society has no real answer when it comes to the meaning of life. A great number of individuals, of lesser or normal intelligence, fall victim to this goal-driven type of existence. This keeps them busy and gives them a reason to live, while utterly ignoring any profound spiritual meaning that life can offer. However, this only works up to a point, and only with superficial, ego-driven or less-intelligent people. This is where stress, anger and suffering come into play. Unable to fulfill their next superficial desire, or lacking any new objectives in life people become essentially empty. It is at this point that they begin to struggle and try to find a meaning to it all. When no answer is provided or they are unable to understand the answer, people either become insane or spectators. This is very interesting. Those deprived of love and social contact, which are intelligent enough, lose their mental integrity. They essentially become disconnected from reality because they cannot face it. I call this the intellectual way of becoming insane. Many great thinkers and artist suffered from this at one point. This mental condition is caused by a profound spiritual crisis. However, it is avoidable and even reversible. It is a sort of a fake degenerative disease of the mind. Those lucky few who can see beyond their memory, education and knowledge become enlightened. I will talk about this a bit later. The intellectual madman is the minority case of the two presented above. The vast majority of western sufferers are the so called spectators. At least, I call them that. They are the people who lost any REAL purpose in life and who can find any profound meaning but don't even try. To them, life is uneventful and pointless. They are too scared to live their life as they dream, and therefore are spectators. They let other people live their life and accomplish their dreams for them, while they just watch. They watch in movies, they watch on tv, they read in books and whiteness on the internet. They are the ultimate spectators. But few things really impress them anymore, and they have few things they feel strongly about. Because life is pointless there is no need to fight for anything or stand up for what they believe in. They just watch, while governments and companies dictate the rules and act on their behalf. They are essentially watching a big movie, waiting for it all to end. War? What do they care? It doesn't hurt them, right? Loss of civil rights? What do they care….they don't even exercise most of their rights or even know them….World chaos or crisis? Ehh….perhaps it's better that way, they don't like the world that much anyway. This is what happens when there is no spirituality and all meaning is lost. Emptied of all passion for life and unsatisfied by what is offered to them, people just give up on happiness. This is what I call the spectator syndrome. I believe that most of us so called westerners are at some stage of becoming a madman or a spectator. All because one little notion – MEANING. Religion is but a partial answer to this problem, as it offers a doctrine and does not satisfy the natural intelligence of the human being. It's just another set of rules. Many shamans and mystics believe that religion is the worst thing that mankind has done to God. They have turned the almighty presence of nature ant the universe itself into narrow minded, dogmatic thinking. This is not the fault of the wise men themselves (Jesus, Mohamed, Buddha, Lao Tzu) but the fault of their followers who perverted and misled others using religion.
So, what is this fundamental difference of thinking between west and east? What is the difference between the philosopher and the mystic? Why is the educated philosopher unhappy while the mystic dances in the rain? Why does the philosopher feel the need to rationalize and explain the world using his so called knowledge? Why does the mystic feel the presence of god and acts every second of his life driven by pure creative energy? All perfectly valid questions. I bet the philosopher looks at the mystic and says- look at this mad man, how he behaves so irrational and illogical!! He does not know that his rationality and knowledge are his main constrains. The mystic looks at the philosopher, as he sits surrounded by his books, all alone in his dark study, trying to find the formula for life and says—why don't you leave your books for a minute and come outside to dance! It's a beautiful day! Stop trying to put life in a book and live it!!! The philosopher answers—Nonsense!! There will be a day like this later!! I don't have time to waste on dancing and singing!! But that day never comes for him, because he forgot how to live. He says that he is trying to accomplish something. But what is the meaning of his accomplishment?? Does his purpose have a real meaning, or is it just the struggle to outrun his own madness and unhappiness. You need to learn meditation, the enlightened mystic says to him. You need to empty your mind of stress and memory and let God flow thru you. All the answers will come to you then… --This is pointless!!! Says the philosopher. I'd rather kill myself then waste my life like you do!-- Don't you know that all life is sacred? Says the mystic disappointed, and leaves to admire the sunset…
People, you need to realize that spirituality is not a hobby, to attend to in your spare time, if there's nothing good on tv !!!!! Love and be loved. Bring happiness to the world and be creative. Respect the sacred nature of life and of all creation. Learn to appreciate nature, and realize that a single flower is more valuable than a whole empty galaxy. Smell that flower and admire it, and understand that it is one of the ultimate products of the universe and its complexity. All the answers are there for you to find. There is no better place for you to be then there, in that fresh spring field, admiring that flower. It is the ultimate savor of your ultimate privilege--consciousness. Is it hard to live in the moment? Is it hard to do what you are passionate about and to be an original creator? By definition, it is impossible for that to be a burden. However, you must first let go of prejudice and fully understand yourself. Anything else is a waste of your time. Mystics have given a very nice definition of time—Time is the measuring unit that allows thought to become reality. So? How are you spending your time?
vineri, 6 august 2010
About us humans
I'm sure you read a lot of love stories and watched a lot of films about love. It is, after all, one of the most passionately debated, depicted and talked about subjects in history. Ironically, it was the reason for a lot of pain, suffering, violence, and even wars. Humans have always misunderstood love and have caused, in direct consequence, a lot of misery on its behalf. We have always believed that love is a prize, and …..like any prize, it has to be won or taken. Our egos made us think that love is something we deserve, take for granted and even demand. We have used love to exploit, manipulate and hurt each other. That is the sad reality. Love has become a vicious tool in the hand of those who don't even understand it. It is also sad that most of us don't even understand its meaning. In a sense, it can be said that we are like newborn children, given a precious gift by our maker but, being young and inexperienced, we are unable to appreciate it. We waste love, pervert it and hurt each other in the process. All of these things happen because of our very nature. All men are not equal…People can choose to evolve, or can choose to live a life of pleasurable ignorance. The human spirit can exist on many levels, all of which occupy the same world. Some spirits need a lifetime to understand their purpose, some need many lifetimes, and some may never evolve, haunted by their insecurities and dominated by their chaotic and egoistic nature. Fear is mankind's biggest plague and courage is our most precious resource. Again, an irony can be found. Both of those characteristics can be born out of egoism. The human ego is a paradox in itself. We cannot exist as separate individuals without an ego, and at the same time, it is our biggest enemy. So, were does love fit into all this? Love is perhaps the only expression of selflessness. Love is surrendering to an emotion and letting the voice of god resonate inside of you. Love is understanding, even at a subconscious level, that the notion of "me" is just an illusion and that time is artificial. Love is living in the moment and giving the most you are able to while only taking what you need. This is how nature works and this is what was intended for all living things. Nature is selfless and balanced. Nature is all individuals and al individuals are nature. The whole has no sense without it's parts and any part has no sense without the whole. Quantum physics and fractal geometry have proven this reality without a shadow of a doubt. Ancient mysticism and religion have known this for thousands of years (Zen Buddhism, Kabbalah and Taoism ) So, why is it so hard for us to accept it? Is it because we think it will render us useless and insignificant? Is it because it means that our destiny has parts we can't control? Is it because we refuse to think that we are not in charge, as separate individuals? Society has taught us from am young age that:
- life is hard
-we must work to achieve titles
-we must work to earn lots of money
-we must improve our social status and become "successful"
-we must be "better" then others
-we must strive to distinguish ourselves
-we must become educated and demand respect
I ask you.....What parent doesn't want all those things to come true for their child? What parent doesn't feel a sense of pride when his son or daughter becomes what society considers "successful" . What parent doesn't brag to others about their son or daughter getting admitted in to the best collage? They all do. Why? Because of their giant egos. They are just saying: "My child is better than yours" or "I've been a better parent than you". Far to less are parents asking their children : "Are you happy?" or "Are you sure that this is what you are passionate about?" or "Why have you stopped singing?" or "Why have you stopped drawing like u used to?" They are all giant idiots. Most push their children to achieve things they don't even want or need, just to satisfy their ego. This is a pathological sickness. This is why people are mediocre and unhappy. They fill their lives whit activities, forgetting to even ask themselves :" Is this what I should be doing?" Happy are those who are patient enough, strong enough and wise enough to act in their true purpose. Your purpose may be to paint, act, dance, draw, write and do allot of other creative things that inspire and bring joy to others. Instead of embracing this role, people become lawyers and engineers and economists, because that's what society considers a true achievement. Let me tell you right now, Bob Dylan has accomplished more with a single song, and Renoir has accomplished more with a single painting than most lawyers or economists achieve in a lifetime. Their spirits were free and their creation was pure. The work they did in a few hours or days, has the power to inspire millions of people. Bob Dylan wrote "Blowing in the Wind" in 10 minutes....So, why don't we have the courage to be what we need to be anymore? Why don't we have the courage to love what we need to love anymore? Is it because society may consider it wrong? Is it because mommy or daddy don't approve or because people will talk? All this peer pressure is ridiculous. I want my children to be happy. I want my children to dance and to draw and to dream. I want them to experience the universe in all its limitless glory, so that when they grow up, they will know what it means to be free. Only then can they be what god intended them to be, and not what society or I may desire.
vineri, 25 iunie 2010
Creativitatea -Primul "Eridu": un exercitiu de imaginatie
Am citit aseara cateva afirmatii interesante intr-o carte care trateaza fenomenul creativitatii. Autorul ( inspirat din gandirea religiilor orientale) defineste creatia ca fiind un gest absolut obiectiv, in sensul ca necesita o "golire" a eului patologic care marcheaza secolul trecut si in general arta moderna. Astfel, creatia necesita o odihna mentala si un echilibru al individului in starea de a actiona si nu de a avea o activitate. Trebuie sa te lasi patruns de spiritul divin si sa prezinti doar creatia pura si obiectiva, nu sa exteriorizezi asa numita "mizerie" interioara. Astfel de activitati pot avea rol terapeutic pentru autor, insa nu pot provoca o stare de meditatie si o inaltare spirituala. Creatia este deci un act de daruire. Este un act de manifestare a vointei divine prin intermediul creatorului. Creatorul acorda un sens propriei existente si nu se considera accidental.
Am avut un "vis" deosebit. Vreau sa-l descriu in asa fel incat sa va puteti imagina ca priviti acel spatiu, la un moment dat. De asemenea, am sa ma straduiesc sa nu fac un spoiler din acest textJ. Am sa va invit sa faceti un mare exercitiu de imaginatie. Sa incepem: Ne aflam intr-un loc foarte indepartat. Undervra in univers exista un loc care nu se misca niciodata. Toata materia si toata energia fuge de acest punct. De aici a inceput totul. Aici un gand a devenit o idee, ideea a dat nastere unor reguli si acele reguli au dat nastere universului. Totul s-a intamplat foarte rapid. In prima secunda scenariul a fost deja scris si toate destinele au fost faurite. Restul este doar o piesa de teatru mega-galactica, interpretata mai bine sau mai rau de micii actori pierduti prin spatiu si atat de izolati. Pentru ei totul este un mister si totul se misca atat de repede. Aici, in centru, timpul curge foarte lent si adevarul se lupta cu el insusi in echilibrul tensionat al realitatii. Aici, in centrul tuturor lucrurilor, exista o lume. Este o planeta pe care o vom numi Eridu. Aceasta orbiteaza in jurul unei stele de culoare rosie . Sistemul mai are o stea, de un alb-galbui stralucitor. Aceasta este mult mai masiva si este legata intr-un dans etern cu mica stea rosie. Planeta are o fata permanent orientata catre mica stea si este foarte apropiata de aceasta. Acea fata este un infern acoperit de stanci. Cealalta fata a planetei nu vede niciodata steaua in jurul careia orbiteaza si este scaldata in lumina alba a celulilalt astru. Aici viata a gasit un mediu mult mai stabil. Exista tot felul de vietuitoare, in ceea ce se poate numi o adevarata gradina zoologica si botanica a intregului univers. Aceasta colectie impresionanta a fost adusa aici de catre forte necunoscute. Ambele fete ale planeitei au cate un mega-continent inconjurat de apele oceanului planetar. Cele doua mase de pamant sunt separate de mii de kilometrii, insa exista o legatura intre ele. Un lant de insule leaga cele doua continente. Acest lant trece prin polul sud al planetei. Mai exista un grup de insule mici situate la polul nord. Aceste insule sunt separate de ambele continente si sunt total inaccesibile datorita fenomenelor atmosferice si oceanice. O furtuna permanenta inconjoara asemenea unui inel polul nord. Mai trebuie spus ca Eridu are trei sateliti foarte diferiti. Unul masiv de culoare rosie, unul mic de o culoare verzuie si unul moderat ca dimensiuni, de culoare albastra. Ziua dureaza cam 70 de ore si este impartita egal intre lumina si intuneric. Nu exista sezoane. Timpul pare a sta pe loc aici. Viata exista pe ambele fete ale planetei si pare a fi adusa aici cu foarte mult timp in urma. Cele doua continente sunt insa lumi total diferite. Haosul si ordinea sunt aici separate de mii de kilometrii si inca nu se cunosc. Aceste capodopere vii ale marelui experiment cosmic sunt foarte diferite . Ele se afla in "zone" diferite ale relatiei individului cu universul. Toate insa au ceva in comun: Intensitatea energiei pe care o emit in gandirea proprie si in actul creatiei. Toata aceasta energie capata aici un comportament unic. Totul pare a fi un adevarat reactor al constiintei. Insasi energia constiintei este aici atrasa de singularitatea nucleului cosmic si directionata in locuri nebanuite. Marele experiment urmeaza sa intre in ultima sa etapa. Echilibrul tensionat urmeaza sa fie rupt iar energiile dominante se vor intalni in conditiile perfecte. Odata cu finalizarea acestei confruntari va fi decisa si soarta intregului univers. De fapt, intregul univers exista pentru a da o solutie acestei confruntari, inainte ca intreaga sa energie sa se dilueze dincolo de orice structura finita si palpabila.
Aici, in centrul tuturor lucrurilor, mai exista ceva. Este un loc bine pazit si ascuns, aflat in cel mai rece si mai spectaculos loc de pe Eridu. De aici, lumina ambelor stele poate fi vazuta. Cerul are o culoare rosiatica tot timpul iar noaptea nu exista. Daca privesti catre linia orizontului, in orice directie te vei uita, vei vedea un ocean nesfarsit si acoperit de nori . Acolo furtunile sunt permanente si poti vedea chiar descarcarile electrice. Lumina celor doua stele aflate jos pe bolta cereasca coloreaza norii si le ofera un aspect unic. Aici unde stai tu, vremea este insa linistita. Desi este cel mai rece loc de pe Eridu, nu este foarte frig si te poti misca in voie prin zapada fina. Undeva, aproape de tine, vezi o coloana de lumina aflata in centrul unui lac negru. Atmosfera este linistita, parca golita de energiile conventionale insa te simti inundat de o pace interioara si intelegi ca te aflii intr-un loc important. Te apropii de acel lac si observi ca el nu reflecta lumina si nu pare a fi facut din apa. Te apleci si faci un bulgare de zapada pe care il arunci in lac. Acesta dispare imediat ce atinge suprafata intunecata si lasa in urma o mica coloana de lumina cat si sute de unde luminoase pe suprafata lacului. Brusc, intelegi ca aici este o granita, iar tot ceea ce tine de universul in care traiesti se termina la suprafata neagra a lacului. Dincolo nu poate fi decat alteritatea totala. Este oare acest loc sursa tuturor lucrurilor? Sunt oare, dincolo de aceasta poarta, toate raspunsurile la intrebarile fundamentale? Vei afla oare ca energia trairilor tale este mai puternica decat cea a unei supernove? Vei trece oare in nefiinta intr-o realitate in care tu nu mai ai sens iar individualitatea ta nu mai inseamna nimic? Te uiti in spate si realizezi ca lupta care va decide soarta universului tau tocmai a inceput. Lupta nu va ajunge si la tine deoarece acest loc este izolat, insa rezultatul ei va afecta pe toata lumea, total si imediat. Vei alege sa ramai in lumea ta si sa speri intr-o victorie a ordinii sau vei alege sa te arunci in lacul intunecat, cat mai ai timp?…Indraznesti sa confrunti o noua realitate, o revelatie pentru care poate nu esti pregatit si care te poate elimina ca individ? Sa fie oare atat de radical acest pas catre evolutia spiritului? Este oare acesta destinul tau? Stai in zapada, la marginea lumii tale si nu stii cat va mai dura iluzia timpului…Acum, deschizi ochii si te trezesti. A inceput o noua zi si percepi lumina cunoscuta a soarelui tau. Eridu se afla la miliarde de ani lumina de tine si cu fiecare clipa care trece te indepartezi tot mai mult de acel loc. Totusi, in mintea ta, el este inca aproape…
vineri, 23 aprilie 2010
Sfantul Gheorghe si Balaurul: Lupta dintre haos si ordine
De mai mult timp mi-am dorit sa scriu ceva despre Sfantul Gheorghe. De asemenea, de vara trecuta cand am avut ocazia sa vad la National Gallery cateva dintre cele mai interesante picturi care-l reprezinta in epica sa lupta cu balaurul, mi-am dorit sa realizez si eu propria interpretare grafica a evenimentului. Pentru aceasta a trebuit sa studiez cele mai cunoscute icoane si sa citesc cate ceva despre viata sfantului si despre legendele care-l inconjoara. Sfantul Gheorghe este una dintre cele mai venerate personalitati ale crestinismului. El este sfantul patron al mai multor tari ( Ethiopia, Grecia, Rusia, Anglia, Portugalia, Palestina etc.) si are o viata destul de bine "documentata". Acest lucru nu impiedica insa existenta unor legende legate de faptele sale. Papa Sf. Gelasius (cel care l-a canonizat pe Georgius in sec. V) spunea despre Sf. Gheorghe ca este "unul al carui nume este in mod just venerat intre oamneni, insa ale carui actiuni sunt cunoscude doar de Dumnezeu." Hai sa va povestesc pe scurt viata Sfantului Gheorghe. El s-a nascut la sfarsitul secolului al III-lea, intr-o familie nobila de crestini din Lydda (Orientul Mijlociu). Mama sa era din Palestina iar tatal sau era un respectat ofiter din armata romana (nascut in Cappadocia). In adolescenta, tanarul Georgius isi pierde ambii parinti. Acum el se hoaraste sa se inroleze in armata romana si este intampinat cu entuziasm, intrucat tatal sau fusese unul dintre cei mai buni ofiteri ai imparatului Diocletian. Tanarul soldat avanseaza rapid in ierarhia militara, ajungand la o varsta de 26-27 de ani la rangul de Tribunus (oarecum echivalent unui colonel actual, din cate am inteles) si devine un membru al garzii imperiale din Nicomedia. In anul 302, Diocletian semneaza un ordin in urma caruia toti soldatii crestini din armata romana urmau sa fie arestati, iar ceilalti trebuiau sa-si afirme supunerea fata de zeii pagani, prin sacrificii. Tanarul Georgius, care era pe vremea aceea unul dintre cei mai valorosi membrii ai garzii imperiale, il confrunta pe imparat si isi declara public credinta. Diocletian, care-l cunostea si-l respecta pe tribun, nu vrea sa-l piarda ca aliat si incearca in repetate randuri sa-l converteasca, oferindu-i cadouri, titluri si pamant. Georgius refuza de fiecare data si este in final arestat si inchis. Este torturat si decapitat in Nicomedia (in anul 303), devenind astfel un martir al crestinismului. Imparateasa Alexandra, care a fost martora la suferinta lui Georgius, este profund impresionata de convingerea si curajul acestuia si decide sa adopte crestinismul ca religie. Ea va fi condamnata si decapitata ulterior… Pe scurt, acesta este cursul vietii sfantului… De unde a izvorat insa faimoasa legenda a "biruitorului de balaur"?? Aici, realitatea incepe sa se amestece cu legenda si trebuie studiate multiplele surse ale acestui motiv mitologic. Legenda Sfantului Gheorghe este adusa in Europa medievala de catre soldatii intorsi din cruciadele estului indepartat. Sfantul Gheorghe devine sursa de inspiratie a armatei crestine in prima cruciada si se spune ca acesta a aparut in fata soldatilor inaintea asediului de la Antioch (1097-1098). De asemenea, unul dintre cei mai nobili cruciati ai vestului, regale englez Richard I, (Richard "Inima de Leu") a avut revelatia Sfantului Gheorghe in lupta. Se spune ca, privindu-l pe Richard in mijlocul bataliei, Saladin (sultan al Egiptului si Siriei) l-a vazut pe acesta pierzandu-si calul. Impresionat de vitejia lui Richard, sultanul a poruncit imediat sa se trimita un sol cu steag alb, care sa aduca regelui un cal. Infrant in lupta, Richard trimite o scrisoare lui Saladin in care-i promite ca se va intoarce si va cuceri pamantul sfant. Saladin raspunde, afirmand ca dintre toti printii crestini, daca ar fi sa piarda Ierusalimul in fata cuiva, atunci ar prefera sa-l piarda in lupta cu Richard. Aceasta mica paranteza am folosit-o pentru a evidentia una dintre trasaturie adesea atribuite Sfantului Gheorghe, si anume onoarea. In timpul cruciadelor, Sfantului Gheorghe i se atribuie propriul drapel: faimoasa cruce rosie pe fundal alb. Dupa cruciade, Sf. Gheorghe devine sfantul-protector al Angliei ("Oficial", dupa victoria miraculoasa a regelui Henry al V-lea, in lupta de la Agincourt-1415, in fata cavaleriei franceze). Hai sa ne intoarcem la legenda luptei cu balaurul si sa studiem cea mai cunoscuta forma a acesteia. Se spune ca in orasul libian Lydda traia un monstru care teroriza localnicii, punand stapanire pe izvorul atat de necesar pentru supravietuirea acestora. Pentru a merge la izvor si a lua apa, localnicii erau obligati sa ofere o oaie sau un alt animal drept sacrificiu. Vesnic nesatul, balaurul devoreaza toate jertfele aduse si in curand, vine randul printesei sa fie oferita monstrului iar regele se roaga ca aceasta sa fie crutata. Sfantul Gheorghe este cel care intervine, ucide balaurul si salveaza viata printesei. In urma acestei fapte deosebite, locuitorii orasului decid sa adopte crestinismul ca religie oficiala. Sfantul Gheorge este deci cel care prin curajul si nobletea sa reuseste sa raspandeasca religia crestina. Cam aceasta este legenda legata de lupta cu balaurul. Ea isi are originea in orientul mijlociu si face parte din intelepciunea ortodoxismului grec al perioadei de inceput. Cea mai faimoasa reprezentare a sfantului (si anume cea in care acesta, calare fiind, strapunge balaurul cu sulita) are ca sursa de inspiratie o icoana greceasca de la inceputul celui de-al doilea mileniu. Aceasta imagine a fost preluata de artisti precum Raphael si este inca reprezentarea "oficiala" a sfantului. Acum urmeaza partea interesanta. Am sa urmaresc aceasta legenda, a infrangerii balaurului, pana la originile ei!! Primul lucru care-mi vine in minte, avand in vedere implicarea grecilor in legenda Sfantului Gheorghe, este povestea lui Perseu si a Andromedei. Hmmm, hai sa vedem daca seamana!! Se spune ca nea' Perseu, dupa ce a belit-o pe Medusa s-a hotarat in sfarsit sa se duca acasa! Pe drum, o vede pe frumoasa Andromeda, pe marginea apei, legata cu lanturi de niste stanci!! El afla ca mama fetei, Cassiopeia l-a suparat pe Poseidon prin faptul ca s-a dat mai buna ca amanta acestuia!! Atunci, Poseidon, in loc sa o ia si pe Cassiopeia drept amanta, s-a atacat imediat si a trimis un potop si un sarpe de mare sa terorizeze pamanturile in care domnea regele Cephus, tatal Andromedei. Disperat, regale decide sa o ofere pe nevinovata (si probabil virgina) Andromeda drept ofranda sarpelui de mare! Aceasta il implora pe Perseu sa o salveze si el se indupleca, dar numai daca Cephus il lasa sa o ia drept nevasta. Eroul beleste sarpele si organizeaza nunta cu Andromeda, insa dupa ce rezerva si restaurantul,…afla ca tanara domnisoara era promisa deja lui Phineus. Acesta vine cu armata peste ei, insa Perseu pastrase capul Medusei si-l foloseste pentru a impietri adversarii! Celebra scena este pictata de Luca Giordano (am avut placerea sa vad pictura tot la National Gallery , in Londra)…Ok! Se pare ca exista destul de multe elemente comune cu mult mai tanara legenda a Sfantului Gheorghe….nu? In continuare, voi merge muuuuult mai departe in timp si voi vorbi despre legendele sumeriene ale creatiei si despre mitologia babiloniana (pentru ca totul se leaga, mai copii). Cine are impresia ca exista prea multe "mitologii" total diferite si lipsite de influente se insala amarnic. Este vorba aici de un foarte interesant joc de "telefonul fara fir", in care diverse evenimente sunt preluate, prelucrate si prezentate sub semnul altei civilizatii sau al altei religii. In mitologia babiloniana, se vorbeste despre o zeitate feminina numita Tiamat... Ea este un fel de "mama" a lumii, fiind creatoarea apelor primordiale care apar in haosul universului. Tiamat este o zeitate "ambivalenta". Ea este atat stapana creatiei cat si un agent al haosului (lucru care se intampla odata cu evolutia socio-politica a sumerienilor). La inceputuri, Tiamat este zeitatea cu putere suprema. Nimeni nu se poate impotrivi dorintelor sale, ea fiind stapana "Tabletelor Destinului", nascatoare de monstrii si alte creaturi marine. Profunzimea acestei legende cat si originile ei sunt foarte….infricosatoare. Textele sumeriene sunt cele care vorbesc despre vizitatori din cer, zeitati supreme ale pamantului cat si despre unele lucruri din domeniul astronomiei a caror acuratete este cutremuratoare. Nu am sa intru in aceste detalii, insa trebuie mentionat faptul ca scrierile sumeriene sunt primele forme de inregistrare a datelor si a evenimentelor de pe Pamant…Ne intoarcem la Tiamat. Spuneam ca pe vemea aceea, dupa cum canta Tiamat, dansau toti zeii. Ea ofera Tabletele Destinului lui Kingu pe care il alege stapanul zeilor, in ulma luptei primordiale. Un zeu numit Anu, se impotriveste insa vointei supreme si se lupta cu Tiamat. Se vorbeste si despre o "sulita invincibila", pe care Anu o poseda. In urma luptei, curajosul Anu (cunoscut mai tarziu drept Enlil si Marduk) o ucide pe Tiamat, iar moartea ei este cea care duce la formarea cerului si pamantului. Anu are acum Tabletele Destinului si se instaleaza in fruntea zeilor. Am adus deci, in urma acestei povestiri, legenda rapunerii balaurului in forma ei primordiala. Semnificatia care se ascunde in spatele acestei lupte este una profunda, fiind legata de insasi esenta existentei. Mitologica lupta intre bine si rau, ordine si haos, entropie si materie organizata este cea care ne defineste ca entitati constiente. Intreaga evolutie si dezvoltare a constiintei umane este o lupta cu haosul si cu propriile limite. Actul de a rapune balaurul este unul simbolic, legat de victoria asupra dezordinii si tiraniei. Sfantul Gheorghe este poate chiar un membru "tanar" in clubul celor care au rapus balaurul si au adus echilibru lumii. Exemple de acest gen, pe o scara mai mica sau mai mare, continua sa apara si nu este de mirare ca legenda este una menita sa inspire si sa atraga admiratie. Fiecare se poate lupta cu propriul balaur. Indiferent daca acesta este mai mult sau mai putin fioros, infrangerea sa necesita curaj. Este inca o lupta cu cu propriul ego, pentru a aduce fericire. Este destul de evident de ce "sfantul soldat" este unul dintre cele mai importante figuri ale crestinismului. El semnifica in mod direct lupta cu un inamic VIZIBIL, pe care-l simte cu toata fiinta si pe care trebuie sa-l rapuna, nu pentru bunastarea sa ci pentru bunastarea intregii lumi. Majoritatea oamenilor nu sunt capabili sa perceapa acest "balaur" si deci nu stiu incotro sa-si directioneze energia. Cunoasterea sa este prima etapa pentru motivarea personala si pentru cultivarea dorintei de a evolua. Lipsa intelegerii acestui fenomen poate duce la lipsa unui scop real in viata sau a dorintei de dezvoltare spirituala. Sper ca am reusit sa va dau ceva de gandit astazi, cu ocazia sarbatorii Sfantului Gheorghe, cel al carui nume il si port si cel al carui mister am incercat sa-l deslusesc. |